<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Sociology</title>
    <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology</link>
    <description>Blacksacademy</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>marius@supersuccessteam.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2007</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2007-02-19T15:01:57-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Social Inequality</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/social-inequality/</link>
      <description>I - Social stratification 

Social inequality can be analysed in terms of three factors: 

1. Power, which means the extent to which one individual or group can impose their will over another individual or group without that individual or group’s consent. 

2. Prestige, which means the extent to which individuals or groups are esteemed, honoured or respected by the rest of society. 

3. Wealth, which means the extent of an individual or group’s possessions, including land, property, commodities, cash, bank deposits, shares, stocks, bonds and any other form of security. 

Marxists believe that power and prestige are dependent on wealth, so effectively the only prime form of social inequality is wealth. However, others disagree.</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T15:01:57-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Class Structure in Western Societies</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/class-structure-in-western-societies/</link>
      <description>I - How many classes are there? 

It is usual to draw a distinction between the working class and the middle class. From a Marxist perspective both belong to the proletariat as a whole. Usually, the working classes are regarded as undertaking manual jobs, and the middle-classes as undertaking non-manual jobs. The working classes are further sub-divided into unskilled, semiskilled and skilled manual workers. 

The middle classes are sub-divided into routine nonmanual labour, such as clerical and secretarial work, intermediate non-manual labour, such as teachers and nurses, and professionals, such as doctors, lawyers, accountants and senior managers. Owing to deindustrialisation, there has been a general shift in the proportion of those working in manual jobs to those working in non-manual jobs. 

There are also gender differences to consider – women are less likely to have manual jobs than men, but they are more likely to have jobs belonging to the lower grades of the nonmanual spectrum – that is, have routine non-manual jobs, or occupy the lower grades of intermediate non-manual labour, such as nursing.</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:59:42-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Modern Functionalism and Social Stratification</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/modern-functionalism-and-social-stratification/</link>
      <description>I - Modern Functionalism 

Functionalists maintain that a system of social inequality serves the needs of society as a whole. In other words, all benefit from such a system, including those at the lowest levels of the social ladder. For example, they argue that a system of stratification maintains the order and stability of society. 

Talcott Parsons is a prominent functionalist who argues that the stability and functioning of society is maintained by a value consensus, that is, an agreement among members of society that the social order is worth preserving. Hence, functionalism is also known as consensus structuralism; it states that society is structured into functionally distinct groups, including classes, but that the cohesion of society as a whole is maintained by a consensus held by members of society that such as structure is natural and fair. Parsons also maintains that American society, for instance, is a meritocracy since social status within it is achieved rather than ascribed; that is, the American system of stratification is open as opposed to closed. He argues that American businessmen deserve their high social status because they have achieved it through their own work and skills. 

In this way, Parsons argues that American society is fair.</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:58:44-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Social Mobility</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/social-mobility/</link>
      <description>I - Early studies of social mobility

It is believed that social mobility in industrial societies is greater than in pre-industrial societies. That is, people can progress from one social stratum to another with more ease in modern society than in agricultural society. The system of social stratification has become more open; status is more achieved rather than ascribed. It is usual to study social mobility in terms of occupational mobility. David Glass et al conducted a study of intergenerational mobility in 1949, using occupational categories as follows:

1. Professional and high administrative
2. Managerial and executive
3. Inspectional, supervisory and other non-manual (higher grade)
4. Inspectional, supervisory and other non-manual (lower grade)
5. Skilled manual and routine grades of non-manual
6. Semi-skilled manual
7. Unskilled manual</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:56:44-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Tom Bottomore: Classes in Modern Britain</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/tom-bottomore-classes-in-modern-britain/</link>
      <description>I - The Nature of Social Class 

Bottomore defines social stratification to be “any hierarchical ordering of social groups or strata in a society.” The older forms of social stratification are based on slavery, caste or estate; newer forms are based on social class (that is, economic class) or status group. 

He takes the view that social stratification does not rest on biological difference. He also quotes T.H. Marshall (1950) who wrote, “the institution of class teaches the members of a society to notice some differences and to ignore others when arranging persons in order of social merit.” Class is maintained through inheritance: “... inequalities of incomes depends very largely upon the unequal distribution of property through inheritance, and not primarily upon the differences in earned income..” 

Class differences do not arise out of differences in abilities – we do not live in a meritocracy: “... intellectual ability ... is by no means always rewarded with high income or high social status, nor lack of ability with the opposite.”</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:53:53-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Theories of Racism</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/theories-of-racism/</link>
      <description>Psychological theories of racism 

Psychological theories of racism argue that racism is a form of extreme prejudice and is a manifestation of the psychological process of social perception. A prejudice is a form of extreme stereotype, and a stereotype is an attitude of one person towards another individual or group. Prejudices are forms of group stereotypes, and the formation of group stereotypes is a product of the formation of attitudes. 

Prejudices are linked to ego-defence – the adoption of attitudes that serve to bolster the selfesteem of the individual that holds them. 

Tajfel’s social identity theory maintains that individuals naturally strive for positive self-image, and social identity is enhanced by the process of categorising people into in-groups and out-groups. In other words, social psychologists have a tendency to see no need to look outside the concepts of social psychology in order to explain the formation of prejudice. Some psychologists also maintain that there is a distinct personality type that is inclined to adopt racist attitudes. The Frankfurt school in particular ...</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:51:37-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Concepts of Race, Ethnicity and Nationalism</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/concepts-of-race-ethnicity-and-nationalism/</link>
      <description>The concept of ‘race’ 

Miles defines racism “as any set of claims or arguments which signify some aspect of the physical features of an individual or group as a sign of permanent distinctiveness and which attribute additional, negative characteristics and/or consequences to the individual’s or group’s presence.” For this to mark a racist attitude the biological difference must be genetically inheritable. 

Whilst not all sociologists would accept this definition of racism, it has the use of indicating that any theoretical justification of racism is underpinned by a pseudoscientific theory that there exist different races, and furthermore, that these races have distinct abilities that justify the use of terms such as “superior race” and “inferior race”. 

This in turn is used to justify the domination of “inferior races” by “superior races”.</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:50:45-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>American Exceptionalism</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/american-exceptionalism/</link>
      <description>I - American Exceptionalism

It is generally accepted that the Americans are not class conscious, and that American workers are not motivated by the desire for class struggle. American seems to be the exception – for example, in Europe worker’s unions have actively sought to replace private ownership of the means of production by a system of collective ownership. 

This is called the thesis of American Exceptionalism. 

Europe during the C19th provoked a working-class resistance that became of “spectre” threatening revolution. America, by contrast, was by the beginning of C20th remarkable for the weakness of the working-class. 

As early as 1906 the German sociologist Werner Sombart asked the question, “Why is there no socialism in the United States?” Various answers have been proposed.</description>
      <dc:subject>Stratification and Diversification</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-19T14:47:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Perspectives on Education</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/perspectives-on-education/</link>
      <description>I - Class and alienation

To understand the different perspectives on education, it is necessary to understand the concept of class. From this point of view the conflict structuralism of Marx is the starting point. This states that individuals are born into different classes where their consciousness and opportunities are determined by their economic situation. A member of the working class leads one kind of life; a member of the bourgeoisie leads another. 

To say that there exist classes in society is to say that society is stratified. Here the essential claim of Marxism is that the educational system serves to perpetuate stratification.</description>
      <dc:subject>Aspects of Society</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-17T14:18:10-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Education and Etnicity</title>
      <link>http://www.businessfocusgroup.net/index.php/blacks_sociology/education-and-etnicity/</link>
      <description>I - Race and ethnicity

The background concept here is that of the divisions introduced into society by the existence of distinctions between groups of people along the lines of race and ethnicity. Does membership of a non-white racial or ethnic group mean that, on average, your educational opportunities in Britain, or elsewhere, are lower? The answer to that appears to be “yes”!</description>
      <dc:subject>Aspects of Society</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2007-02-17T14:16:52-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>